Blog

  • I want names!

    Dark roadI am not going to quote anything from the CBC site on this story (becuz they charge for the pleasure), but I can sure summarize:

    Somebody put an ad on an online site called USEDWinnipeg.com offering to pick up Aboriginal people and drop them off in “the hood” or a reserve or just out of town. It was taken down pretty quick but not before it made the rounds of the usual suspects out there. Now some groups want a criminal investigation calling it a hate crime.

    That it may be, but I’d like you to consider whether we shouldn’t take advantage of something like this. You know, to submit a few names of some racist idiot and have that person dumped out on some rez or in the “the hood” some dark and stormy night.

    Any suggestions?  Mu-ha-ha-ha-ha…

    [Image via guy schmidt]

  • Calculating the Bottom Line for First Nations

    CalculatorA few days ago, the federal Conservatives proposed their new budget, totaling out at roughly $280 billion in expenditures (versus apx. $231 billion in revenues). And as we saw in Tim Fontaine’s overview, the 2010 federal budget included a few multi-million dollar programs and services aimed at Aboriginal people.

    Millions and billions: these are impressive, even incomprehensible sums of money. But in all the emotional commotion of debates over government spending, and how taxpayers must ultimately pick up the tab for said spending, it’s easy to forget that governments both get and give out that money in much smaller increments.

    On the get side, it can be surprising to realize that if you were to receive a dollar from every man, woman and child in this country, you’d instantly have about $33,000,000. Obviously, kids (and, as of Feb. 5 at least 8% of adults) don’t work, but you could cut this in half and still make the point: pooling even tiny sums from millions of people generates massive amounts of money.

    On the give side — the spending side — we always need to remember that any government program budget is ultimately divided up as follows:

    i) by the number of communities receiving government monies; and

    ii) by the number of years these monies will flow.

    So, for example, under a one million dollar, five-year program supporting 20 communities, how much do you think each community would get every year? Answer: $10,000 a year. Can you get a lot in the way of goods and services for $10,000/year? Suddenly, $1,000,000 doesn’t seem nearly so impressive.

    With that stone cold math in mind, let’s turn our attention to some bottom line equations for First Nations.

    According to one section of the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) website, there are over 630 First Nations in Canada. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC), meanwhile, says there are 615.  (The reasons for the gap are for another discussion; we’ll round down to 600 for the sake of convenience and argument.)

    Now, imagine with me if you will that the federal government has just announced First Nations across Canada will receive $600,000,000 for some new program over the next 5 years. Six hundred million? Whaa? That’s a lot of money! Isn’t it?

    Yes and no. Armed with our new number-crunching formula, we first calculate the following:

    $600,000,000 / 600 communities
    =  $1,000,000 per community

    A million dollars per community? Sweeeet!  Oh, but wait: we also need to do another calculation:

    $1,000,000 / 5 years
    = $200,000 per community each year

    Okay, still not bad, but how does that actually break down per person in each of those communities?

    According to AFN, a majority of First Nations (60%) have fewer than 500 members; just 7 per cent have more than 2,000 members. (Obviously, that leaves the other 33% with somewhere between 501 and 1,999 members.)

    Again for the sake of argument, let’s say that the 500 members figure exists for all First Nations. This is a very ‘generous’ proposition, as it means fewer people splitting the same pot, so they’d each receive more funding on a per person basis ($500,000 / 500 = $1,000 a person, whereas $500,000 / 2,000 = $250 a person).

    Accordingly:

    $200,000 / 500 people
    = $400 per person each year

    And don’t forget, that $400 has to be stretched over the full year:

    $400 / 12 months
    = $33 per month

    Thirty-three dollars a month: about a buck a day.

    Furthermore, none of this factors in having to pay somebody in the community to actually deliver this program. (Never mind that each layer of INAC bureaucracy will inevitably take out their slice in administrative costs, thereby reducing the actual money available for communities.)

    And so, the next time the Government of Canada announces it’s given $600,000,000 in funding over 5 years to some nation-wide Indian program and you find yourself either angry or impressed with that figure, remember to first do the math.

    [Image via bgilliard]

  • The Beat Goes On: the 2010 Aboriginal JUNO nominees

    JUNOThis week the annual JUNO Awards announced its list of nominees competing for honours as the best in Canadian music in 39 categories. As in any awards presentation on this scale, the subjective “best” label lies in the hands of a number of judges, and the JUNOs has 330 of them. We can argue until the bears come out of hibernation about the merits of awards like this — when artistic achievement and mainstream appeal go head to head — but I’ll keep this to a snapshot of the nominees in the Aboriginal category.

    Digging Roots
    Heartfelt and powerful roots-rock, infused with a barrage of genres including blues, funk, and hip hop. We Are was my favourite album of 2009, so naturally I’m picking them as a lock to take home the JUNO. Raven and Shoshonna play their music with a commanding passion seen in few other bands out there today.

    Lucie Idlout
    She’s been a staple on the Canadian Aboriginal music scene for much of the last decade and her latest album Swagger proves why. She can rock and she can serenade – skills that give her such an epic stage presence live. Her voice draws on the rich backbone of Inuit music, giving her a unique eclectic vocal dominance.

    Inez
    Inez could easily be the dark horse in this category. Sing Soul Girl captured the hearts of fans right across the country and won her four Aboriginal Peoples Choice Music Awards last fall. Today’s Aboriginal musicians been known to showcase their diverse talent and appeal, and Inez totally embodies that. She mixes a lot of traditional music with contemporary R & B in songs that have garnered lots of radio play over the last few months.

    Wayne Lavallee
    If there are two genres of music Indians love, they are blues and country. You’ll find lots of that on Trail of Tears, blended of course with traditional melodies and compositions that lean more towards folk. Lavallee’s a very, very strong songwriter and that may fare well with JUNO judges.

    Digawolf
    Honestly, this is the nominee I am least familiar with, but from what I’ve heard of Distant Morning Star, he’s a great guitarist with a knack for writing catchy hooks. There’s a strong spiritual presence in his lyrics drawn from the apparently strong ties to his Dogrib roots in the Northwest Territories. Expect to hear lots more from him.

    The winner will be announced at the awards ceremony in St. John’s in April. For those who think an “Aboriginal” category marginalizes our artists, check out the “Ghetto-ization or Assimilation” episode of ReVision Quest.

  • Different song, same old sh*t

    Recently, CBC Radio’s The Current interviewed some people about a proposed youth recreation centre in northend Winnipeg aimed at Aboriginal youth. What could be wrong with that, you ask? Well, the Youth for Christ group behind the proposal is a fundamentalist, evangelical Christian group that wants to convert youth over to its particular brand of religion.

    This raises a number of issues. First, YFC’s going to use public money to do this. A lot of people feel that the City of Winnipeg, its Mayor Sam Katz and more than a few of its councillors are crossing a line by giving taxpayers’ money to one particular religious group whose aim is to convert or undermine those of other religions or beliefs. Not kosher, they say.

    Second, opponents say the project is being rammed through without proper debate or a chance for people to express their concerns.

    Third, and why this winds up on this page, there are a lot of Aboriginal people who are sick and tired of missionaries and fundamentalist types coming into their communities to take their children away from their own Indigenous spiritual beliefs, ceremonies and religions.

    Take this letter that appeared in the Winnipeg Free Press for example:

    We take great exception to the idea of providing millions of dollars in funding to a Christian evangelical organization led by individuals with no connection to the many organizations doing important work in the inner city. We do not reject the work that faith-based organizations are doing in our community. We work in collaboration with many such organizations. We are, however, very concerned with organizations like Youth for Christ because they have very explicit objectives to “Christianize” youth through their missions in the inner city. These objectives are clearly stated on their website. Of particular concern is a mission that includes “the aboriginal youth community as a prime area for development… “

    Me? I just don’t like hypocrisy, like when people claim to be doing things for one reason but have other intentions in mind.

    Read more here.

    [image via TheChristianAlert.org @ Flickr]

  • Budget Day! Budget Day! How some Aboriginal-related programs fared

    214759009_75d436cddcWell, it wasn’t what most people wanted to hear, but it sure was what many expected.

    The 2010 Federal Budget was released to much fanfare in Ottawa today, and by the looks of things, it’s time to lace up those moccasins reeeeeal tight (or belt, it’s your fancy).

    Here’s a quick breakdown of how some federal programs fared (those that directly impact Aboriginal people) in today’s budget:

    • $30 million for aboriginal education from Kindergarten to Grade 12.
    • $285 million over two years for Aboriginal health programs like the Aboriginal Diabetes Initiative and the Aboriginal Youth Suicide Prevention Initiative
    • $200 million for residential school survivors (because the need was higher than anticipated, apparently)
    • $10 million to address violence against women with Justice Minister Rob Nicholson expected to announce details in the near future
    • $53 million toward Aboriginal child and family services
    • $179 million over two years to improve First Nations water and wastewater systems
    • $105 million toward improving health systems and access to healthy food in the North

    Now, obviously, this did not meet the expectations of some, but it wasn’t exactly a dramatic dropping of the axe.

    However, there’s still some nervousness for Sisters in Spirit, who were hoping to hear that they would be getting some $5 million for the next five years.  The budget did make mention of $10 million over two years for “action to address violence against Aboriginal women,”  but didn’t specify exactly what that means…

    There was also no mention of the $500 million that National Chief Shawn Atleo wanted to flow to First Nations for post-secondary education.

    A veeeeery interesting day on The Hill, but expect tons of reaction in the coming days.

    UPDATE: The Native Women’s Association of Canada (NWAC) has issued a press release outlining their hopes for the $10 million on offer from the Feds.  Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK) have also responded to the Budget, or rather its lack of new money for housing.  More to follow, I’m sure…

    [image via spine @ Flickr]