Blog

  • Asinabka artistry: Ottawa festival back for second straight year

    Asinabka2013As an emerging film and media arts festival, Asinabka takes its name and inspiration from a key traditional site in Ottawa that highlights Indigenous culture and stories for people from all walks of life to enjoy.

    “It’s an homage of respect to [the late] Algonquin elder William Commanda,” says filmmaker and festival co-organizer Christopher Wong, citing the internationally-renowned spiritual and cultural leader. “He saw Victoria Island (also known as Asinabka) as an ongoing Indigenous space for all people to enjoy.” At the festival, Wong says “people can expect to see really good films and art that will surprise and entertain, both in raw subject matter and innovation.”

    The Asinabka Film and Media Arts Festival runs July 24-28 at venues across Ottawa. It showcases an array of feature and short films by Indigenous filmmakers from around the world. The opening film is Anita Doron’s The Lesser Blessed (based on the Richard Van Camp novel), which will take place at a special outdoor screening at Victoria Island on the Ottawa River.

    Fellow filmmaker and organizer Howard Adler says the inspiration for creating the festival — now entering its second year — came from seeing the success of other Indigenous film festivals like imagineNATIVE in Toronto and Biindigaate in Thunder Bay. “Most other major cities in Canada have Indigenous film festivals,” says Adler. “And when we first started talking about starting one here in Ottawa, there was tons of support and enthusiasm from arts organizations and community members that we spoke with.”

    Anisabka isn’t just about films. There’s a “Gallery Crawl,” featuring exhibits and performances, as well as discussions with filmmakers, including a feature chat with legendary filmmaker Alanis Obomsawin following a screening of her documentary People of the Kattawapiskak River.

    Heartbeats
    Christian Chapman’s “Heartbeats” [photo: Tom Bilenky] Click to enlarge
    Wong and Adler, both Anishinaabe, believe this is essential programming for Canada’s capital. “We felt that we both had the experience and drive to make this happen in an important city like Ottawa that is a role model for the rest of Canada,” says Wong. “Recognizing the importance of Indigenous culture here, as well as French and English, was important to the cultural landscape.”

    Adler agrees. “Really beautiful, innovative, and relevant work is being created by Indigenous peoples in these mediums,” he says. “We’re bringing these stories to Ottawa, which is the centre of political power in this country.”

    “Film and video are such powerful mediums, and when put into the hands of people that are telling their own stories, some really amazing perspectives emerge. It’s important to put a human face on some of the larger issues that most people only hear about through mainstream news and media.”

    They want Asinabka to be a fun and learning experience for all festival goers. “I hope they have a good time and share in the positive experience and work that Indigenous people have been making, not only in Canada, but across the world,” says Wong.

    For the full festival schedule, go to asinabkafestival.org.

  • Sihkos’ Story, Part III: Guy Hill Residential School

    Jane Glennon (Woodland Cree), B.A., B.S.W., M.S.W., is a retired social worker, counsellor and teacher who currently lives in Prince Albert, SK. This is the third in her series of writings for MI about her time at residential school and beyond; consult parts one and two for earlier instalments.

    + + +

    My first residential school having burned to the ground, what was supposed to be a summer stay with family was mercifully extended to December.

    When winter came, our parents had us all move into a small, one-room log cabin built by my father. Somehow, nine people fit inside that tiny structure, a lone wood stove doing its best to keep us warm. There was no concrete flooring; all we had to sleep on was thick bedding placed atop tree boughs and canvass material.

    RabbitSnareDespite our obvious poverty, I remember nothing but contentedness and happiness, and we young children found our thrills where we could, such as all-day sliding sessions down a nearby hill. Sometimes we’d accompany my mother to check on her rabbit snares (pictured above). Made of stainless steel wire that could be readily bent into a circle, this contraption was attached to a stick low to the ground. Once the rabbit’s head went through the wire trap, the contraption would snap. Highly visible rabbit tracks made it easy for my mother to figure out where to set the snares.

    But the snares proved just as useful to other creatures, allowing some animals (likely owls) to help themselves to the spoils. This prompted my mother to hatch a plan of checking the snares at night. Some of us kids tagged along, and I remember how brightly the full moon illuminated the forest. Everything was quiet. All we could hear was the snow crunching beneath our feet: that and maybe the sound of our hungry stomachs, hoping tonight’s moonlit walk would result in tomorrow’s delicious rabbit soup.

    Beyond a modest family allowance of five dollars per child, there was no welfare available, so my father also provided for us by trapping and hunting. There were some extremely hard economic times. Things got so bad at one point that my father had to approach the Northern Store manager to see if he could borrow some frozen fish the manager had been saving for his dogs. I could easily tell how very low and desperate my father felt doing this, but his pride had to be put aside if he was to feed his family.

    * * *

    The day would eventually come for my return to residential school, only this time in a new building and in a new province. Upon my arrival at the Guy Hill Indian Residential School in The Pas, Manitoba — some 90-odd kilometres southeast of my last school — I was subjected to the same coal-oil delousing I had gone through at Sturgeon Landing. Here too our original outfits were taken away, to be either trashed or burned, and individual numbers assigned to us for identification purposes.

    Accompanying me on my first days at this new institution was my older sister Charlotte (continuing the support mission our parents had sent her on at my first school). Two other sisters would later come to Guy Hill when they were of school age. By this point, Charlotte had been deemed ‘unteachable’ by those in charge, so they had her work as a maid instead. Charlotte would carry out these domestic duties at Guy Hill until she turned sixteen, three years after our arrival in 1950.

    Clothes for newly-admitted girls included dresses or skirts, plus thick navy bloomers (a kind of undergarment or panty). In between the dress/skirt and the bloomer was an awkwardly-designed slip: featuring a pocket in the middle, it meant that, in order for us to reach our hankies, we’d have to lift up our skirts or dresses. This involuntary exhibitionism left me feeling embarrassed whenever I had a cold, especially when we were in the presence of the boys.

    Still on the subject of clothes, I remember one time I had been given what I perceived to be some sort of uniform. Convinced that I had been promoted to a leadership role of some kind, I beamed with pride at my new ‘honour.’ I later found out that the dress was actually just something a girls’ scout troop had donated to the school.

    Students were taught according to the provincial curriculum, delivered by the nuns and a few lay teachers. Classes featured no Aboriginal content whatsoever: clearly, the objective here was to assimilate and acculturate Native students. Time and time again, we were reminded of how we had to be civilized. After all, it’s why we were brought to this residential school environment — to forget that we were Indians so that we’d become productive little brown white people capable of joining mainstream society. Still, I must have learned something because I kept passing, even excelling in some subjects, as I earned the required grades to move on.

    It was surely an injustice that we were not allowed to learn our history as Aboriginal people. I wondered why we had to study foreign cultures like the ancient Egyptians. Meantime, some of us had come into the school having learned Aboriginal spirituality from our parents, but these students were told that they had to forget these practices because they were ‘pagan.’ The Catholic religion was pounded into our heads on a daily basis.

    The one bit of relief came courtesy of a class clown (every classroom seems to have one). I recall one morning when the teacher-nun had briefly left the room, the perfect opportunity for this boy to push out a big loud fart. Upon hearing the entire class roar with laughter, the teacher-nun came rushing back in to see what the commotion was all about. Walking directly up to the class clown, she demanded: “Please repeat your joke.” Once again, the class immediately burst out laughing, a moment of hilarity that made everyone’s otherwise boring day.

    * * *

    Where Guy Hill differed most from Sturgeon Landing was in the way it segregated students into groups of small, medium and big girls. This segregation eventually alienated a number of us from our younger, smaller siblings. As a consequence, over the course of my time at Guy Hill, I would increasingly come to reject my younger sister. It was not until after we’d both left school that we became reacquainted, something I found very difficult. For the longest time, I could not forgive myself for what I had done to her. Even today, I have not fully apologized to my sister for rejecting and neglecting her while at Guy Hill. Today, I try to make amends to her in as many ways as I can.

    What skills Guy Hill did provide students were of a mostly practical, household nature. The nuns taught us girls how to knit our stockings, socks, mittens and scarves (perhaps the one useful ability I picked up in all my time there). The bigger girls also took turns performing such tasks as mending as well as washing clothes, stairs and floors. The nuns used to constantly stress the importance of doing everything to perfection: for some students, such nagging meant they went on to become clean freaks as adults. (Whether that is a negative or positive characteristic is anyone’s guess. Happily, I have not been so impacted. My housekeeping standards have always been wanting, carried out only according to my inclination and no one else’s.)

    Girls would also help out in the kitchen, peeling potatoes and preparing vegetables. Meanwhile, I liked cleaning up the dining room where the priests and brothers ate — thanks to their privileged plates, they regularly dined on much finer foods — because I could then help myself to leftovers when the nuns weren’t looking. The nuns likewise ate much better than we did, leaving us to be satisfied with mediocre rations.

    Still with food, I recall one late afternoon when five of us girls waited anxiously on the porch for the baker to bring that week’s supply of fresh bread to school. Soon after he had neatly stacked the loaves and was on his way, we attacked them like starved little animals. With each of us ripping up a loaf, we devoured almost the entire shipment. Of course, it wouldn’t take long for us to get caught and, while it meant we were denied that night’s supper and movie, we all agreed that it was well worth it.

    Now, as punishments go, that was relatively mild. But, in fact, fear and intimidation never felt far from the surface at Guy Hill. I’ll never forget the time this one nun got into a fight with a student. The girl’s medium build was no match for the burly nun’s enormous weight. It all started because the young girl was upset that her little sister’s hair had been forcibly cut by a school employee. Next thing I know, I’m part of a circle of students, some of us with tears in our eyes, unable to do anything but watch this stout older woman pin down and pound on this poor girl. We were all so scared; none of us had the courage to intervene. How desperate and helpless I felt watching this abuse. If I remember correctly, as a consequence of this clash, the girl was sent home, which I thought was totally unfair because no caregiver should ever resort to that type of treatment.

    Some of us girls developed a saying whenever one of the nuns scolded us. We used to whisper the word, kiyâm (kee-YAM), which in Cree means “I don’t care.” We also said it whenever one of the nuns used to whisper “sauvage” under their breath. (Despite their use of French, we understood perfectly well that they considered us savages.) The word kiyâm frustrated the nuns to no end, their faces becoming beet red, a reaction we little rascals enjoyed immensely.

    Another intimidating incident I recall involved me and a boy with whom I was friends at school. With the rules forbidding any talking on the stairway between students, my friend and I had been ‘caught in the act’ by a janitor, who then immediately took us to the principal’s office. The first thing the principal asks when we get there is what the date of my last period was, his not-so-subtle implication that the boy and I had been sexually active. I assured the principal that nothing of the sort had happened, but he was determined to punish me. His strap in hand, the principal then proceeded to instruct me to drop my bloomers down to my ankles. But I had made up my mind that I was not getting strapped for something that I did not do. I started to cry, and after much convincing on my part that I hadn’t done anything wrong, the principal relented, but not before making me promise never to talk to the boy again.

    Incidents like these made it clear to me that the priest and nuns most likely thought of us boys and girls as little more than immoral pagans and savages constantly preoccupied with fornication. I would later come to realize that, if anyone had had a hard time suppressing these kinds of thoughts, it was them — the people whose supposed vows of chastity seemed to only fuel the fire that would leave so many kids scarred. There is much more to tell here, I’m afraid, but, for now, it is a story best left to another day.

    As a young girl, I had not been taught about menstruation, either at home and school. I thus came to regard it as something shameful, and when my period would come every month, I did everything to hide it. I remember that I used to wash my underwear whenever I could and wear it soaking wet. It was a very trying time for me. As for the school itself, all it offered in the way of menstrual pads at the time were flannel cloths. Staff made us soak our soiled cloths in the bathtub, then take turns rinsing them prior to washing. The stench was unbearable. (Later, the school did eventually supply girls with actual menstrual pads.) But that wasn’t the only substitution forced upon us. Instead of regular toilet paper, we were made to use cut-up, square pieces of newspaper. I assumed such deprivation was a way to save the school money.

    indiansMeanwhile, what little recreation we were permitted typically came with its share of negatives. For example, the school often selected films depicting stereotypical ‘Cowboys and Indians,’ with the Indians always portrayed as stupid losers. The assimilation process was certainly at work here: I remember well how some girls used to later re-enact and reflect some of the movies’ themes at playtime. Contrast that experience with the annual dog sled races, which we were never allowed to watch even though some of us knew some of the participants who’d come from our reserves. Undaunted, we snuck around anyway and saw the races through the windows. Of course, for those who were caught, it meant a night without supper or a movie.

    At Christmas time, I remember the children were given the opportunity to visit Santa Claus at some downtown location. We felt privileged as we carried our little bags of candy, the only time that we were allowed to enjoy such treats. Though I doubt it was because staff were concerned about tooth decay: our dental care was administered once a year, usually by a foreign doctor who’d rather pull out teeth than try to save them. It was assumed more money could be made that way, a rationale that infused much of the overall health care we received as children.

    Turning from matters of the body to those of the spirit, my attitude towards Christianity was deeply and enduringly shaped by my time at residential schools, but not in the way those responsible for their creation likely intended. As a result of having to go to church almost every single day at school, I honestly believe that this is why, from the moment I left school, I never went back to church. I would like to believe that God is fair and just. I hope that He hears me as I pray on my own. However, I regret very much that I did not act to instil a sense of spirituality within my own children. When he was five, I had my son Rick baptized in the Catholic Church but this is the one and only time he’s ever attended a service. Had his father been Catholic, or had we been of the same faith, perhaps things would have turned out differently. We were of the opinion that our children would decide on their own as adults what religion to embrace, a decision I very much wish I could have over again. I now see that being forced to attend church as a child had still affected the way I approached religion as a parent, just one of the many ways my earlier experience would later impact my children.

    There are parallels here perhaps with my parents and me. Growing up, they were not church goers. As I mentioned in an earlier instalment, when my parents migrated to Southend, SK they were the only Anglicans amidst a community of Catholics. Like me, my mother was a residential school product and, also like me, she consciously or unconsciously decided not to teach her children any religion. This is partly why I believe my mother underwent the same assimilation process as I did. In fact, I can honestly say that all of my siblings experienced residential school impacts growing up. That said, I acknowledge that my mother tried her best as a parent, and did so despite carrying the struggles that came with being orphaned at a young age then placed in an arranged marriage.

    I eventually did try to embrace Aboriginal spirituality, when my adult daughter Samara and I took part in a ceremony to receive our Native names. However, that’s where our participation in such practices ended; again, I think that’s because I was too deeply brainwashed by my Catholic indoctrination at the schools. Even today, I struggle to rid myself of the fear that I will be condemned forever if I ever decide to leave the Church altogether.

    In my next instalment, I will write of my time at yet another residential school, one that would take me the furthest I’d ever been from my home.

  • As Aboriginal Affairs’ legal bills rise, so does Aboriginal anger

    Over the last six years, Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development (AANDC) has spent more than $35 million on legal fees. That’s according to information obtained from the department’s disclosure of contracts.

    The largest payouts for legal contracts were during the fiscal years 2009-10 ($19m) and 2011-12 ($15m). On average, $700,000 to $1.2 million were paid to individual lawyers and legal firms.

    parliament
    Photo credit: Copyright Library of Parliament / Tom Littlemore

    According to the Treasury Board’s proactive disclosure guidelines, the government must disclose any contracts valued over $10,000.

    By 2012, Aboriginal Affairs’ total legal fees exceeded $110.1 million. Although it’s not clear whether this amount includes the $35 million from previous years, the skyrocketing figures have angered many First Nations.

    “What they’re doing is they’re increasing their budget in communication and legal fees and decreasing their budget in programs and services,” claims Cindy Blackstock, Executive Director of the First Nations Child & Family Caring Society of Canada (FNCFCS).

    Blackstock is well aware how far the department will go to employ its legal mechanisms. For the past 6 years she has been fighting in the courts with the department over funding for First Nations children.

    On behalf of the Assembly of First Nations and the FNCFCS, a complaint was filed regarding inequitable levels of child welfare funding provided to First Nations children and families on reserves as compared to children residing off reserve. The complaint takes aim at the department’s funding formula for child and family services.

    “Through an access-to-information request I was able to determine [Aboriginal Affairs] spent at least 3 million dollars trying to derail the hearing on the merits in that particular case,” says Blackstock. “They will use whatever legal technicality that they can to try to escape a hearing on a substantive issue.”

    maurinabeadle
    Maurina Beadle from Pictou Landing First Nation, Nova Scotia.

    On a recent, related front, the federal government is appealing Maurina Beadle’s case – a Pictou Landing First Nation mother that won a court ruling based on Jordan’s Principle, a child-first policy meant o ensure First Nation children receive the same services as children off-reserve.

    Beadle, who cares for a severely special-needs son, has also been recovering from a stroke.

    “I don’t understand why the government would be appealing a case that gives legal effect to what they unanimously agreed to in Parliament,” says Blackstock.

    Aboriginal Affairs has been waging legal battles in cases dealing with First Nations children but also First Nations policing, special education, and ongoing litigation with residential school survivors and land claims.

    NDP MP Aboriginal Affair’s critic, Jean Crowder says it doesn’t speak to the collaborative relationship the department chants.

    “It’s not surprising that every time there’s a court decision, they appeal it,” says Crowder.

    “They talk about a respectful partnership and collaboration but it actually has to translate into meaningful action,” says Crowder referring to the departments 2013-14 Report on Plans and Priorities.

    Based on the report, claims and litigation represents Aboriginal Affairs’ largest portion of liabilities (70.7 per cent) of their total net liabilities forecasted at $14,120 million.

    Meanwhile on its site it states, ‘AANDC firmly believes that the best way to address the issues with respect to Aboriginal Peoples is through collaboration and not through litigation.’

    “When I look across the landscape of cases I don’t’ know of one where they are actually arguing for the rights of First Nation people, even though the department of Aboriginal Affairs is suppose to have a trust obligation,” says Blackstock.

    But ‘legal issues will continue’ given the Crown-Aboriginal relationship, according to the department.

    Recently it was reported the federal government’s overall legal spending was at an all-time high, peaking $500.8 million in 2011-12.

    “If the costs continue to accelerate in terms of the different litigation going on, my worry is it’s going to impact funding levels to communities,” says John Paul, executive director of Atlantic Policy Congress of First Nations Chiefs.

    APCFNC is just one of several Aboriginal organizations and tribal councils to face a funding reduction from Aboriginal Affairs.

    “If you keep escalating these costs and putting more resources into the litigation of these issues, I think it’s going to take away from what the department is doing.”

    What is known is legal fees are on the rise while funding reductions are taking place across the country.

     

  • Confusion over the First Nations Financial Transparency Act

    According to Aboriginal Affairs, nothing but good will come from the First Nations Financial Transparency Act. They say the Act will help create stronger, effective and more self-sufficient communities.

    photo 2
    AANDC Minister Valcourt announces the First Nations Financial Transparency Act on March 27, 2013.

    Not only will it help First Nation communities become prosperous, the Department says the Act will bring transparency and accountability to First Nation members and to Canadians at large.

    The Act received Royal Assent on March 27 and forces First Nation governments to publish their annual audited financial statements, including Chiefs and councilors’ salaries and expenses.

    Joseph Quesnel welcomes the new legislation. He’s a policy analyst at the Frontier Centre Public Policy and says First Nation leaders needn’t worry about exposing their goods.

    Quesnel points to Chief Glenn Hudson of Peguis First Nation as a prime example of how the Act should work. Hudson is a First Nation leader who once had an exorbitant salary but is now earning a modest pay cheque after the band’s finances were made public.

    Between 2008-09, Chief Hudson reportedly earned more than $200,000.

    “All it took was one unveiling of the information and he reduced it,” says Quesnel. “It didn’t irreparably damage him.” Chief Hudson was recently re-elected.

    But not everyone thinks the legislation is necessary.

    Prior to the Act, many communities such as Sawridge, Fishing Lake, and Wabigoon Lake First Nations already had their own mechanisms in place that provided a level of transparency and accountability to their members.

    After every audit, the Wabigoon Lake First Nation presents the information at their annual general meeting. The audit is also available on an individual basis to those who request it.

    “That process has been there for years,” says Chief Cantin.

    But some say the First Nation Transparency Act actually goes against Canada’s Privacy Act, meant to place limits on the government’s ability to disclose personal information.

    Two court rulings — Sutherland (1994) and Montana (1988) — reaffirmed such limits when it came to First Nations financial statements.

    Kris Klein is an Ottawa-based privacy lawyer who says the First Nations Transparency Act is in direct conflict with the spirit of the Privacy Act.

    “I don’t know if you want to call it a loop hole or not but the Privacy Act says that the government or whoever has the information can disclose personal information if another law requires it,” says Klein.

    “As soon as they passed this piece of legislation there won’t be a conflict with the Privacy Act.” photo 1

    Chief Cantin believes the transparency act has its roots in a scathing report released by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) in 2010. The CTF published documents allegedly showing that some First Nation Chiefs were earning more than the Prime Minister of Canada.

    Brad Regehr from the Canadian Bar Association says the CTF’s report was nothing more than inaccurate data and computations — but he says the Canadian government bought it.

    “The concern was to get good public relations out of this to make it look like they [the government] were doing something,” says Regehr.

    “This is simply an easier reaction to some criticism they got from the Canadian Taxpayer Federation and maybe some other groups who painted this alarmist picture.”

    Regehr is still left wondering why the government wanted to pass the Act given their existing powers under ‘contribution agreements.’ First Nation governments receive band funding for community governance and delivery of services provided by Aboriginal Affairs. The details of that funding is laid out in the ‘contribution agreements.’

    If a First Nation government does not comply with the rules outlined in the contribution agreements, Aboriginal Affairs can impose conditions, claw back funding and even appoint third-party managers. Attawapiskat First Nation was at the receiving end of this back in 2011.

    “It seems that some of the attempt is to embarrass people,” says Regehr.

    Klein says it speaks to the political landscape.

    “Maybe it has to fit in with this particular government’s belief in open government and transparency in the way public money is spent,” wonders Klein.

    But for some, the public tax dollar argument is up for debate. Chief Cantin says the money First Nation communities receive is from resources extracted from their traditional territories.

    “There’s no resource revenue sharing ever since the treaties were signed and I feel the treaties were broken,” says Chief Cantin.

    “If we had our legal share of all the resources that has been extracted, we wouldn’t have this relationship, we’d have our own legislative body to manage that money.”

    But Quesnel disagrees.

    He says number treaties in particular were based on surrendering title and privileges to non-reserve lands for the sake of non-Aboriginal settlement.

    “There is historic evidence that First Nations signatories at the time understood they were giving up land and resource rights to non-reserve lands when they signed treaties,” says Quesnel.

    While more transparency mechanisms tighten for First Nation governments, Regehr is left wondering if more needs to be done at the federal level.

    “It seems kind of hypocritical in light of all sorts of news reports as for an example, now we’re paying way more for the navy’s new ships than any other country would pay or billions of dollars of anti-terrorism funding not being accounted for,” says Regehr.

    As of July 29, 2014, First Nation governments will be required to disclose their audited financial statements.

    “I am definitely hoping for the best,” says Quesnel.

    “It will be interesting to see what happens once the information is available and how the members will response to that. I think it will put the ball in their court.”

  • Sihkos’ Story, Part II: Sturgeon Landing Residential School

    Jane Glennon (Woodland Cree), B.A., B.S.W., M.S.W., is a retired social worker, counsellor and teacher who currently lives in Prince Albert, SK. This is the second in her series of writings for MI about her time at residential school and beyond.

    + + +

    Sturgeon Landing IRS
    Sturgeon Landing IRS, 1926-52

    In September 1951, on a nice, cool fall day, my sister and I walked through the doors of a residential school for the first time in our lives. Located in the midst of a small Saskatchewan settlement known as Sturgeon Landing (roughly 9 hours’ drive northeast of present-day Saskatoon), the school was built in the vicinity of Sturgeon Lake.

    The school was operated by an Oblate Missionary, with nuns of the St. Joseph order teaching and supervising about 200 girls and boys. Most of the students were Woodland Cree from the surrounding area. Meantime, the few native families who actually lived in the settlement had their children enrolled in a day school located on the other side of the lake.

    number-32Immediately upon their arrival at Sturgeon Landing IRS, the children were told by the nuns to throw away the clothes they had been wearing and to put on a kind of dark uniform instead. We were also assigned a number at that time: mine was ‘32.’ This would serve as your “ID” throughout the year. When your number was called, it was usually for ‘misbehaviour’ (in their eyes, anyway); otherwise, it was for routine situations like being called to do chores, or seeing the doctor for your annual check-up.

    It would only occur to me later on that this sort of treatment — where you’re only known by your number — was not much different than what would happen in jail or in the army. We were like robots then: always told what to do, feel, and say. Our behaviour was always monitored. Everything had to be done in unison with the other girls. Individuality was non-existent in every aspect of our lives.

    That first day at Sturgeon Landing, every child was subjected to delousing, whether we needed it or not. It began by soaking our heads with coal oil; I still remember that burning sensation when the sister rubbed it into my scalp. Short haircuts followed, for both boys and girls. (Happily for me, I was exempted from this procedure: as a condition of me going to school, my parents had come to an agreement with our local priest and Indian agent that my hair would be kept long. But my happiness would be short-lived. With my jet-black hair done up in pig-tails, I was an easy target for hair-pulling by jealous girls who’d lost theirs. I requested that my waist-length locks be cut off like the others soon after.)

    But the de-lousing was not done: there was still the DDT. Once the nuns applied the white, pungent powder, they covered our now chemical-laden heads with towels. We were then sent to bed, made to wear this DDT-towel combination overnight. If anyone knew at the time that DDT could be extremely dangerous to human health, they sure didn’t tell us children.

    The 200 children at the school that year were evenly divided between 100 girls and just as many boys. They ranged in age from six to 18 years. Children were strictly segregated by gender almost the entire time; the only exceptions were at mealtime or Sunday services. Even then, girls would be placed on one side of the dining room or chapel, boys the other. Neither side was allowed to speak to the other, though I do remember some of us would sneak in a smile and wave across the gap at mealtimes now and then.

    Not surprisingly, religion was a part of daily life for the students. The chapel was actually located within the school itself. Other than Sunday, boys and girls would attend mass separately, and on alternate days. Prayers were recited at every meal. Every week saw us stuck in confession, whether we had something to confess about or not. Just to have something to say, I remember once telling the priest that I had sworn at another kid under my breath, even though I hadn’t. In fact, we all went to church so often that I remember sleepwalking down two flights of stairs towards the chapel. Only good luck prevented me from falling down and hurting myself.

    As for the food we had to eat, it was usually rationed (i.e., single servings, small portions) and all too often rotten. Our diet consisted mostly of fish, typically whitefish. Even though it came from nearby Sturgeon Lake, the fish was not always very fresh. I recall one time when I had to keep washing down my dinner with tea and water because of how spoiled it smelled. Breakfast typically meant porridge, and almost every time it came with the privilege of having it sprinkled with mouse droppings. Eggs, meanwhile, were a rarity despite the fact there was a farm with chickens right behind the school.

    Looking back on those ten months at Sturgeon Landing Residential School, I recall feeling deprived in almost every way: emotionally, mentally, physically, spiritually. Affection between students such as touching or holding was strictly discouraged and regarded as sinful, even among siblings.

    Constricted and restricted most of the time, I was extremely careful not to misbehave at the school. I remember vividly how sick children had to suppress their coughing at night for fear a nun would come along and give you the belt. I remember this one big, mean nun — Kimâmânaw, as some of the girls called her, or ‘our mother’ in Cree. I did not understand why they would honour her with that name: I distinctly remember how this Sister once grabbed a girl by the hair, then banged her head on the cement basement floor of our so-called ‘playroom.’

    As I wrote in my first installment, I was inconsolable that first night at the school, despite my sister’s best efforts to comfort me. But the tears kept coming, night after night. I was an introvert and internalized my pain at being separated from most of my family. But somehow I made it through to June, when I would once again rejoin my family in Southend for the summer. I tried to make the most of it. Every time I thought about returning to Sturgeon Landing, I vowed that I would find a way to not make it happen, which eventually became a plan to run away into the bush when the time came for the plane to take us back.

    Then came one blissful day in late August 1952, when the local priest informed all the parents in Southend that the school at Sturgeon Landing had burned down. That was one of the happiest days of my life. It renewed my hope that I could now stay with my family and rebuild what was there before between us. I had yet to experience the disappointing news that another residential school would become available and all too soon take over my life again.